Management decision based on objective data is a key component in any company. For example, on a project-by-project basis, Lean Six Sigma projects provide means of analyzing process data to achieve process improvements. In the larger organizational view, these process improvement are initiated so that the organization can achieve its organizational priorities. The priorities are developed bases on analysis of key stakeholder needs and wants, including the costumer, shareholder, and employee groups. In this way, data driven management provides a means of achieving organizational objectives by quantifying needs or wants of stakeholder groups relative to current baselines, and acting upon the data to reduce those critical gaps in performance.
The choice of what to measure is
crucial to the success of the organizational. Improperly chosen metrics lead to
suboptimal behavior and can lead to people away from organizational´ s goals
instead of toward them. Joiner (1994) suggest three system wide measures of
performance – overall customer satisfaction, total cycle time, and first-pass
quality. An effective metric for quantifying first-pass quality is total cost
of poor quality. Once chosen, the metrics must be communicated to the members
of the organization. To be useful, the employee must be able to influence the
metric through performance, and it must be clear precisely how the employee´s
performance influence metric.
Rose (1995)
lists the following attributes of good metrics:
·
They are customer centered and focused on
indicators that provide value to customer, such as product quality, service
dependability, and timeliness of delivery, or are associated with internal work
process that address system cost reduction, waste reduction, coordination and
team work, innovation, and customer satisfaction.
·
They measure performance across time, which shows
trends rather than snapshots
·
They provide direct information at level at which
they are applied. No further process or analysis is required to determine
meaning.
·
They are linked with organization´s mission,
strategies, and actions. They contribute to organizational direction and
control
·
They are collaboratively developed by teams of
people who provide, collect, process, and use data.
Nowadays, Balanced Score cards
help the organization maintain perspective by providing a concise display of
performance metrics in four areas that correspond roughly to the major
stakeholders – costumer, financial, internal process, and learning & growth
(Kaplan and Norton, 1992). This table shows an example of objectives and the performance
metric:
Balanced scorecard metrics
|
||
GOAL(Objective)
|
Candidate Metrics (Measure)
|
|
Financial
|
Increase in turnover of 15% on last year
|
Monthly turnover
|
Customer
|
Customers must receive their deliveries in full and on time
|
What % of monthly deliveries reached desired destination in full and
on time
|
Process
|
Appoint a new sales person
Enter all orders into the production planning system promptly
|
Date salesman appointed
Number of orders entered within 24 hours.
|
Innovation
|
Change infrastructure - install a new XYZ widget maker
|
Installation date of new machinery
|
With performance metrics you take
a measurement and rate it against a Target for comparison. The Target
is usually graded into levels like Outstanding, Above target, on Target and
below target. In the presentation of results the target levels are usually color
coded so you can see at glance if you are on target, below target, above
target, etc….
Ask yourself!!
·
Do you
have good metrics?
·
Are your
improvement initiatives tied to organizational objectives?
No comments:
Post a Comment